Date: July 30, 2005 (Crowe’s Analysis)
Location: Seattle (Analysis of Paris, 1823 Archives)
On July 30, 2005, Seattle enjoyed a pleasant 73°F, a gentle breeze carrying the aroma of coffee and croissants from local bakeries into Downtown. The city’s core pulsed with Saturday energy—glass skyscrapers reflected the sun, while historic brick facades whispered of the past. A few blocks from the Seattle Public Library, Pike Place Market buzzed as a 2005 hotspot, with tourists and locals weaving through stalls, buying bouquets or fresh salmon, laughing as vendors juggled fish for the crowd. But caution was wise—the Seattle Police Department reported 200 pickpocketing incidents in the area that year, keeping visitors on guard.
James Crowe sat in the 5th-floor reading room of the Seattle Public Library, surrounded by a scattered array of documents. His workspace was a controlled chaos: a notebook filled with scribbled notes, a red pencil for marking key details, and an empty coffee cup. The 38-year-old private detective was deep into his second historical case: a 1823 scam involving forged documents in Paris. The reading room hummed softly—students flipped through textbooks, elderly researchers whispered, and a 25-year-old woman in headphones bobbed to music, occasionally glancing at Crowe with curiosity.
Sarah Wilson, the 45-year-old librarian, approached with a box labeled “Paris, 1820s,” her dark hair in a tidy ponytail, her thin-framed glasses slightly askew.
“Mr. Crowe, this is your fifth day straight here,” Sarah said, her tone soft but concerned. “Do you ever sleep? And you forgot to clear your cup again.”
Crowe looked up, pale from sleepless nights but eyes alight with intensity. He grinned, nudging the cup aside. “Sorry, Sarah, I got carried away. Sleep’s for people who aren’t unraveling 200-year-old mysteries.”
Sarah sighed, a faint smile on her lips. “You’re hopeless. But if you need more coffee, I can grab some—just don’t spill it on the documents.”
“Scout’s honor,” Crowe replied with a mock salute.
Sarah rolled her eyes and walked away, leaving Crowe to dive into the records. He untied the box and examined Paris police reports from 1823. In July of that year, a 70-year-old woman named Marie Dupont was arrested for selling forged documents that let buyers purchase land at rock-bottom prices in post-Napoleonic War Paris, where property values had crashed. The documents, bearing seals mimicking official ones, enabled buyers to claim plots in areas like Montmartre—land that later soared in value. Marie confessed she worked for the “Brotherhood of Starlight,” and her “son,” a 25-year-old named Jean, was a “temporary” family member assigned as a cover. The 1823 investigators dismissed her as delusional, finding the idea of “temporary families” absurd.
Enjoying the story? Show your support by reading it on the official site.
Crowe used his “360 Method” to reconstruct the scene in 1823 Paris. He pictured narrow streets alive with the clatter of horse-drawn carts, vendors hawking goods at Les Halles market. He envisioned Marie, a frail woman in a tattered dress, her gray hair in a bun, selling forged documents to a young merchant in a frock coat, while Jean, her “son,” scanned the crowd for police. Crowe imagined officers in brass-buttoned uniforms dragging Marie to a damp cell, laughing off her talk of the “Brotherhood of Starlight.”
He focused on overlooked details: the forged documents bore a star-shaped seal, the “mark of the Brotherhood,” matching the Order of the Star Path’s symbols from 1755. The report also noted Marie received letters from London, hidden in her shack, which the investigators ignored due to limited international cooperation in 1823. Using his “chain of connections,” Crowe cross-referenced London records from 1823, finding a group funding the Paris scam, with one letter mentioning an “operation in Montmartre” led by “Agent Marie.” The Brotherhood exploited the economic slump to buy land cheap, reselling it for profit as the market recovered. Marie was a pawn, Jean a decoy—her testimony, if caught, would sound insane, shielding the London orchestrators.
Crowe applied his “Mirror Game” to analyze their behavior. The Brotherhood chose Marie, an unassuming elderly woman, and paired her with a “son” to blend in. Letters from London, encrypted with a simple substitution cipher, were child’s play for Crowe to decrypt, revealing a “next operation in Vienna.” The 1823 investigators lacked the tools to crack the case—they couldn’t decrypt the letters, ignored the star seal, and dismissed the “temporary family” concept. But Crowe solved it, pinning the report to his corkboard, circling the star seal, London letters, and Montmartre operation in red marker.
“Well, Marie, your scam was clever,” Crowe muttered, a sardonic grin on his lips as he rubbed his eyes. “But I turned out to be sharper than your investigators.”
Kyle, the 30-year-old with dreadlocks, entered the reading room, holding a book on Paris history. “Still here, detective?” he asked warmly. “You look like you’ve uncovered something big.”
“Let’s just say I cracked a 1823 scam in Paris,” Crowe replied with a faint smile. “Want to hear about forged documents?”
Kyle sat across from him, eyes lighting up. “Absolutely—I’m a sucker for old crime stories.”
Crowe gave a concise rundown, showing Kyle the report and notes. Kyle shook his head in awe. “You’re a genius. But aren’t you worried this organization might still be around?”
“I am,” Crowe admitted, his tone grave. “But if I don’t expose their secrets, they’ll keep running their scams.”
In 2005, Seattle thrived: the Bumbershoot Festival loomed, and Modest Mouse gained traction with Good News for People Who Love Bad News. But for Crowe, those were background notes—more mysteries awaited.
