Date: August 10–11, 2005 (Crowe’s Analysis)

  Location: Seattle (Analysis of Paris, 1905 Archives)

  On August 10, 2005, James Crowe sat in a small cafe on the corner of 5th Avenue in Seattle, cradling a cup of coffee. The weather was warm at 77°F, a light breeze carrying the salty scent of Puget Sound as cars and tourists bustled toward the Space Needle. In 2005, Seattle was a cultural hub: Death Cab for Cutie gained traction, and the Bumbershoot Festival prepared for another season. But Crowe’s mind was in Paris, 1905.

  He’d left the library to clear his head, his table now holding his notebook, scribbled notes, and yellowed pages from the “Paris, 1900s” box. Using his “360 Method,” Crowe pictured the Brotherhood’s “classroom”—a spacious room with wooden desks, a chalkboard, and bookshelves. On the chalkboard was a labyrinth with “invisible” walls: some paths appeared open but led to dead ends, the true route requiring logical deduction. The five children sat with paper and pencils: 6-year-old Marie with pigtails, 8-year-old Pierre with freckles, 10-year-old Sophie with blue eyes, 12-year-old Jean with a serious expression, and 14-year-old Louis with an athletic build. Henri Dupont, the 40-year-old educator, stood by the chalkboard, his expression cold.

  “Today, you must find your way out of the labyrinth,” Henri said, his voice laced with expectation. “Some walls are invisible. You can’t see them, but you can guess where they are if you think outside the box. Begin.”

  Crowe imagined the children tracing paths. Marie hit an “invisible” wall and stopped, tears welling. Henri approached, his tone gentle but firm. “Marie, a mistake isn’t the end. If this path is blocked, what else can you do?” Marie tried another route, her face lighting up as she succeeded. Jean worked faster, testing multiple paths, finding the exit in five minutes. Louis not only found the exit but drew his own labyrinth, adding trickier “invisible” walls. Henri noted: “Louis—initiative, ready for advanced tasks.”

  Reading on this site? This novel is published elsewhere. Support the author by seeking out the original.

  Crowe examined Henri’s notes, detailing the “Creative Labyrinth” method, adapted from German psychologist Hermann Ebbinghaus’ 1890s labyrinths for memory and problem-solving. Ebbinghaus, known for his “forgetting curve,” used nonsense syllables to eliminate prior experience. The Brotherhood used labyrinths to teach unconventional thinking: tasks like puzzles with missing pieces or stories from random words forced children to find solutions through failure. Henri encouraged mistakes, showing each failure as a chance to innovate.

  Sarah Wilson approached his table, spotting him through the cafe window. Her dark hair was tied back, her glasses askew. “Mr. Crowe, you’ve escaped the library?” she asked, her voice tinged with irony. “I thought you’d grown roots at that table.”

  Crowe smiled, pushing his notebook aside. “Sarah, I needed a break. But the Family’s mysteries follow me. Want to hear about their method for developing creativity?”

  Sarah sat across from him, eyes lighting up. “Only if you buy me a coffee.”

  Crowe gave a concise rundown, showing Sarah the notes. She shook her head thoughtfully. “That sounds like the perfect way to raise con artists. Do you think they still use these methods?”

  “If they’re as smart as I suspect, they probably do,” Crowe replied, his tone serious. “Which means I need to dig deeper.”

  A 1930s New York document mentioned 37-year-old Paul Lefevre, a product of the Brotherhood’s Paris upbringing. During the Great Depression, Paul orchestrated a scam, creating a fictitious company and selling nonexistent stocks, his creativity a direct result of the “Creative Labyrinth” method. Crowe realized this method made Family members masters of problem-solving.

  “These kids could outsmart anyone,” he muttered, a mix of admiration and unease in his voice.

  Kyle approached, holding a book on psychology. “You’re here, detective?” he asked warmly. “You look like you’ve uncovered something fascinating.”

  “Let’s just say I figured out how this organization taught its kids creativity,” Crowe replied with a faint smile. “They trained them to find a way out of any situation.”

  Kyle sat across from him, whistling softly. “That sounds like the perfect recipe for con artists. Do you think they still use these methods?”

  “If they’re as clever as I think, probably,” Crowe replied. “Which means I need to dig deeper.”